Next step -- Deciding on output

Taral taral at
Fri Feb 7 03:35:45 UTC 2003

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:29:24PM -0500, David Graham wrote:
> I think that only one document is necessary between these two items, but
> a second document be needed as mentionned above. Though I'll agree to this
> proposal in the interests of getting on with it. :)

Hear, hear. Although I kind of feel responsible, since it was me who
started the discussion.

Taral <taral at>
This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me.
"Most parents have better things to do with their time than take care of
their children." -- Me
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the Spi-bylaws mailing list