Summary of comments
jgoerzen at complete.org
Mon Feb 17 21:20:28 UTC 2003
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 03:02:52PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>>>> In article <20030217202447.GA29163 at wile.excelhustler.com>, John Goerzen <jgoerzen at complete.org> writes:
> > It sounds like you're suggesting that once we have our list of
> > problems, we can just look at each one and either reject it as not
> > applicable wrt bylaws amendments, or implement an amendment for it?
> I was thinking that prioritizing the issues at hand would
> also be useful, so we work on the most important issues first, and
> the lower priority items come along as we come to a close.
OK, how about this for the immediate future then:
1. Taral issues a combined document for our inspection
2. We do some brief priortization into some general categories (high,
medium, low). I imagine that finding consensus on this will be
3. Taral issues a new document ordered by priorities
4. Using the Subject line as an identifier, we can discuss several items
concurrently in e-mail, starting with high-priority items. For each
item, we will decide if the best solution involves a bylaws change, and
if so, propose one. If not, we will communicate changes to other bodies
within SPI if appropriate (Board, membership committee, etc)
If this sounds like a good template, I'll rewrite our agenda tonight.
More information about the Spi-bylaws