#03: Board meeting quorum issues
jgoerzen at complete.org
Fri May 9 16:45:26 UTC 2003
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:32:31AM -0500, Taral wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 12:05:03PM -0400, David Graham wrote:
> > If 5 people - half - the board shows up, and because they have not met
> > quorum, they need to have unanimous consent which is actually a higher
> > number of in favour votes than under the quorum rules.
> This works. It enables a "bypass" of the quorum rules in cases where
> meeting quorum would not change the outcome.
OK, I think I could support that compromise as well. I'm convinced :-)
Would you like to write it up David?
> > A possible remedy for "disappearing member" problems during an email
> > meeting is have per-vote quorum. For a vote, at least n board members must
> > agree/disagree/abstain for the vote to be binding. Based on my earlier
> > comments, if 1-4 people vote, the vote isn't binding. If 5 or 6 vote,
> > there has to be absolute concensus. If 7-10 people vote, it goes by simple
> > majority.
> This I very much support. So far I like all your ideas.
I think a per-vote quorum would work well not just for e-mail but for all
meetings. One problem is that sometimes someone steps out of the IRC
Also an absention should not count against the unanimous requirement.
More information about the Spi-bylaws