Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES
Darren Benham
gecko at benham.net
Wed Mar 31 00:20:32 UTC 1999
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 03:59:24PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> How would the membership delegate those things? Election?
Err... I was just presenting contrasts...
> > In fact, any decision of the BOD or any committee should be overridable by
> > a vote of the membership.. but the process should be made troublesome
> > enough that every person with a hair on their pimple can't contest
> > everything.
>
> How about a petition scheme. If a petition is pgp signed by 10% of the
> membership then a vote will be taken which can override any decision of
> leadership?
I'd prefer a seconds approach, personally. Maybe 10% of the body "seconds"
it... but 10% of the people have to sign? 100+ signatures on one document?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you...
> > Another possibility is to let the people volunteer for the committee and
> > let the committee choose the head....
>
> That depends on the situation I would think but we need to have some kind
> of governing structure that approves these things. Hopefully simple.
The BOD accepts and appoints the committee members... no approval necessary
for them choosing their own leader.
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html <gecko at benham.net> <>< *
* -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------*
* Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster *
* <gecko at debian.org> <secretary at debian.org> <webmaster at debian.org> *
* <lintian-maint at debian.org> *
=========================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 233 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/attachments/19990330/35bae576/attachment.pgp
More information about the Spi-general
mailing list