Result for vote regarding new members for the board of
srivasta at acm.org
Sun Feb 23 11:03:19 UTC 2003
>>>>> In article <20030223092531.GA14177 at wiggy.net>, Wichert Akkerman <wichert at wiggy.net> writes:
> Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Debian already has this; rank the one person unacceptable to you
>> below the default option, rank everyone else equally above the
>> default option.
> Yes, the default option it the trick Debian uses to accomplish
> that. However it can also cause an election result that is
> undesired: the 'further discussion' outcome.
Why is that undesired in Debian? Indeed, since you cannot
force anyone in Debisan to stop discussing anything anyway, how is
the reject this proposition any different whatsoever than further
> It might be doable to change the handling of further discussion so
> that you can rank it, but it is ignored in the final result since
> it is not a real valid option.
I posit that if you had a defeat this proposition option, it
could be turned into a further discussion option by anyone
with a MUA and a will to type.
> Think of what would happen when you vote for a new government and
> the result is 'further discussion'. The old government (which
> possibly nobody wants) stays on and all progress is halted.
But neither Debian nor SPI is a government, and,
furthermore, I think that, say, if we can't select a new DPL (since
a significant set of debian developers found all of them
unacceptable, having the old DPL around would be nice, since he was
selected by some folks a year ago.
Darth Vader! Only you would be so bold! Princess Leia Organa
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta at acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
More information about the Spi-general