[draft] Proposed resolution 2003-01-06.wta.2

Jimmy Kaplowitz jimmy at debian.org
Tue Jan 7 17:59:29 UTC 2003

On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:40:15PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Can you clarify whether "Subject to the approval of the board" means
> > that "approval by the board must be sought before implementing
> > procedures" or that "the board may overrule decisions made regarding
> > operating procedures"?  
> The latter would be more sensible given the glacial speed of the
> board's operation, but the former is what's written.  How about this
> language instead:
>  This committee shall operate openly in view of the public.  The
>  committee itself shall determine reasonable procedures for
>  transacting its business, both for its operations and decisionmaking.
>  (The board reserves the right to veto or modify those procedures.)

I agree with both the interpretation and suggestion that Ian puts forth

- Jimmy Kaplowitz
jimmy at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/attachments/20030107/86200ce1/attachment.pgp

More information about the Spi-general mailing list