Resolution for a board membership election

Martin Schulze joey at infodrom.org
Wed Oct 8 07:32:13 UTC 2003


David Graham wrote:
> > 	Continuity?  I think that any more than about one third of the
> >  board being replaced at any given time is likely to be disruptive.
> >  At the discussion on #spi at the time of the meeting today, the
> >  discussion meandered around to electing 3 board members every year;
> >  with a total size of about 9 people, giving each board member a term
> >  of 3 years.
> 
> I don't personally believe that there is serious risk involved in having
> all board seats up for election annually, but I do know I am in the
> minority in this opinion thanks to the debates held on spi-bylaws.

Just FYI: In Germany this is the case usually with such associations
(such as ffis eV for example).  The term can be discussed as 1-year,
2-year or whatever, though.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
If nothing changes, everything will remain the same.  -- Barne's Law

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.




More information about the Spi-general mailing list