Resolution 2003-10-14.iwj.1c

[Martin Schulze]

I'm not convinced that these sections should be part of either resolution.
They don't contribute any useful input except slamming on the board for
$whatever and the bylaws committee.

David Graham wrote:
> >  FURTHERMORE, WHEREAS
> >
> >   16. The ad-hoc organisation of this election is less transparent and
> >       democratic than ideal;
> >
> >   17. The bylaws reform effort appears to have stalled;
> >
> >   18. These problems are in significant part attributable to the
> >       Board;
> >
> >  IT IS RESOLVED THAT
> >
> >   19. The Board apologises to the Membership and the Bylaws committee
> >       for its failure to work more proactively to help reform the
> >       bylaws.
> >
>     20. The Board shall undertake the work necessary to modify the
>         Oranisation's by-laws as per the recommendations of the By-Laws
>         Committee as soon as the election is complete.

-- 
Long noun chains don't automatically imply security.  -- Bruce Schneier