Resolution 2003-10-14.iwj.1c

[Ian Jackson]

Martin Schulze writes ("Re: Resolution 2003-10-14.iwj.1c"):
> I'm not convinced that these sections [the end parts with the
> board's apology etc -iwj] should be part of either resolution.  They
> don't contribute any useful input except slamming on the board for
> $whatever and the bylaws committee.

Well, given that it's the board passing the resolution, I think the
board deciding to apologise is hardly `slamming'.  I think it's only
fair enough.  The board may disagree, of course.

Certainly there's no intent to slam the bylaws committee.

Ian.