Resolution 2004-10-15.dbg.1: Non-meeting voting

[Benj. Mako Hill]

On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:56:36PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Is there any chance of getting a legal opinion on the validity of email
> > meetings?  I wouldn't mind being proven wrong about them.
> 
> Taral writes:
> > According to http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-bylaws/2004/000265.html:
> 
> > Actions may be taken without a meeting only if there is unanimous
> > director consent. (This would appear to apply to e-mail voting.)
> 
> I meant the opinion of an attorney as to whether email meetings would be
> valid meetings under New York law.  If the answer was yes we could consider
> dropping IRC entirely.

I talked to Greg a few days ago who certainly didn't know off the top
of his head but said he would look into it. :)

Regards,
Mako

-- 
Benjamin Mako Hill
mako at debian.org
http://mako.yukidoke.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/attachments/20041022/b12d480d/attachment.pgp