Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status

Anthony Towns aj at azure.humbug.org.au
Fri Mar 2 00:32:59 UTC 2007

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:17:33PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >   6. Debian will appoint a project representative to SPI, who shall
> >      communicate decisions made by the project to the board, and serve
> >      as a single point of contact for the board to communicate with
> >      the project.
> I'm afraid that this fails to clarify precisely the situation that was
> being disputed.  What if the representative fails to honour some
> Debian GR ?  

Then that's something for Debian to resolve, up to and including
appointing a new project representative.

> Now obviously we expect them not to but the resolution
> should be written so that these cases are properly covered.

How is this any different to any other project having a representative
that doesn't pass on properly made decision?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/attachments/20070302/796de842/attachment.pgp

More information about the Spi-general mailing list