Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status

Josh Berkus josh at postgresql.org
Tue Mar 6 02:04:12 UTC 2007


> SPI pledges to obey all OFTC decisions.  Please do the same for the
> debian project.

Frankly, I wouldn't vote to approve the OFTC wording the way it stands if 
they were applying to join today.  It's too vague.  However, since OFTC 
actually needs very little, if anything, from SPI on a month-to-month 
basis, I'm not proposing to change it on the principle of 

A request to "respect all Debian constitutional decisions" is pretty 
useless without a charter specifying how those decisions are going to be 
delivered to the board and how the board is supposed to know that they are 
legitimate.  This is what I believe that Ian was trying to address.

Actually, on the it-aint-broke-don't-fix-it front, what decision or 
question has AJ, or his predecessor, *not* relayed reliably to the Board?  
There's an implication on this thread that AJ is not trustworthy, and I 
have yet to see evidence of it.

--Josh Berkus

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Project Core Team

(all opinions expressed are my own; I do not speak
 for the Project unless specifically noted.)

More information about the Spi-general mailing list