Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status

[Josh Berkus]

MJ,

> I meant to say "summarise the API if you want, but acknowledge that
> the codebase decides the API" - IOW, project constitutions are
> authoritative and SPI doesn't seek to change them.

Sure.  But let's have the definition of the API.  Which includes a 
*limited* number of representatives (most likely, DPL and Secretary) and 
  not "read the consititution to figure out who you have to speak to"

The SPI Board should only have to look at the Debian constitution and 
public voting records under *extreme* circumstances, such as forking of 
the Debian project.

> Hey, do you think that there should be a stable ABI for Linux drivers?
> ;-)

Right, my point exactly.

--Josh