How does SPI differ from SFC?

Joshua D. Drake jd at
Tue Oct 23 16:15:09 UTC 2007

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:12:50 +0100
MJ Ray <mjr at> wrote:

> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd at> wrote:
> > I spoke with the SFLC today. Although it is possible for you to be
> > associated with SPI and SLFC at the same time. It is not possible
> > for you to be associated with the SFC and SPI at the same time.
> Why not?  Do SFC insist on holding all assets for a project, or is
> there some other reason not to co-operate?

It has to do with tax exemption. There is nothing stopping Madwifi from
"working with sfc" and "working with spi".

However, when you are "affiliated" with SPI, you are claiming our Tax
exempt status. There can only be "one" of those.

Joshua D. Drake

> Regards,


      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL Replication:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 

More information about the Spi-general mailing list