Member communications II

Joshua D. Drake jd at commandprompt.com
Mon Dec 22 17:52:49 UTC 2008


On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 14:27 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
> > With all due respect this seems like a motion for the sake of having a
> > motion. 
> 
> It is a motion for the sake of the board's recent failures to fulfill
> member's expectations, I think.
> 

I am not arguing that. 

What is the problem we are trying to solve?

The board's continual failures in communication and following protocol.

How does this motion address the problem any more than the other motions
that have already been passed?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
PostgreSQL
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997



More information about the Spi-general mailing list