Multi-winner Condorcet, vs STV
ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Mon Dec 14 13:19:13 UTC 2009
Markus Schulze writes ("Re: Multi-winner Condorcet, vs STV"):
> in my opinion, the Schulze STV method is
> the best multi-winner election method:
Thanks for pointing us to that. Interesting reading.
I wouldn't support such a thing for a public governmental election,
because of the need for computer involvement. Public elections should
be done with simple and readily verifiable processes - ie, pencil and
However I like the approach and I think it would work well for SPI.
It would certainly be better than the current system. I would be
happy to see Schulze STV adopted for SPI board elections.
> The Schulze STV method is very complicated because I try to create a
> multi-winner election method that minimizes all known strategic
> problems simultaneously.
Is there any software which implements this method already ? I would
be happy to write some. Is there a standard format for STV preference
ballot input data ?
More information about the Spi-general