FFmpeg as SPI associated project
ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri Jun 1 14:46:56 UTC 2012
Robert Brockway writes ("Re: FFmpeg as SPI associated project"):
> While I don't object to your objection (really) I did want to point out
> that this phrase has been in use in resolutions for a long time so I was
> surprised to see the objection appear now.
I'm sorry that I haven't spotted that earlier!
> I understand that Josh Berkus wrote the original version. My suspicion is
> that the 'proposal template' in question predates this.
More information about the Spi-general