www.spi-inc.org uses an invalid security certificate

Jeremy Baron jeremy at tuxmachine.com
Sun Mar 2 17:02:03 UTC 2014

On Feb 27, 2014 6:46 PM, "TJ" <spi-inc at iam.tj> wrote:
> Most sites and browsers support SNI in which case multiple IPs aren't
required, although to
> handle those user agents that don't support SNI it is usual to make the
server's default site
> be the primary HTTPS site for the organisation.

I thought the point of using multiple IPs was to allow one to accept HTTPS
and one to not listen to 443 at all. (Not something you can do with SNI…)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/attachments/20140302/4ee26cc1/attachment.html>

More information about the Spi-general mailing list