Make SPI book keeping more transparent?

Josh Berkus josh at postgresql.org
Thu Jun 11 21:12:19 UTC 2015


On 06/11/2015 02:10 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> On Thu Jun 11, 2015 at 13:19:11 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> On 06/11/2015 12:51 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>>  claims for compensation (unless the treasurer fooled the auditor).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is this really a non-issue, or why did i not received any feedback on
>>> the general mailing list?
>>
>> I find it a non-issue as the books accounts are publicly disclosed
>> monthly and we have a CPA/Book Keeper.
> 
> Ok. I would just like to avoid, that we are suprisingly 'hit' by a
> authority financial audit and are not prepared for that or find out
> disagreement only then.

I will note that we no longer have an assistant bookkeeper (as far as I
know).  Having a 2nd person who had oversight of all financial
transactions was helpful; SPI should look for a new volunteer for this.



More information about the Spi-general mailing list