Make SPI book keeping more transparent?
josh at postgresql.org
Thu Jun 11 21:12:19 UTC 2015
On 06/11/2015 02:10 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On Thu Jun 11, 2015 at 13:19:11 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On 06/11/2015 12:51 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> claims for compensation (unless the treasurer fooled the auditor).
>>> Is this really a non-issue, or why did i not received any feedback on
>>> the general mailing list?
>> I find it a non-issue as the books accounts are publicly disclosed
>> monthly and we have a CPA/Book Keeper.
> Ok. I would just like to avoid, that we are suprisingly 'hit' by a
> authority financial audit and are not prepared for that or find out
> disagreement only then.
I will note that we no longer have an assistant bookkeeper (as far as I
know). Having a 2nd person who had oversight of all financial
transactions was helpful; SPI should look for a new volunteer for this.
More information about the Spi-general