proposed replacement bylaws
Bill.Allombert at math.u-bordeaux1.fr
Mon Jul 4 12:17:17 UTC 2016
On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 03:34:12PM +0200, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Ian Jackson <ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> So, I guess there's a trade-off here. We can have really simple bylaws
> and give the board the ability to modify them, trusting that our nearly
> complete transparency of operations and the legal context in which we
> operate provide the ability to observe and react should the board ever
> "go nuts". I'm quite comfortable with this approach, but I recognize
> that not everyone may be.
I suppose a lot of people would consider a board changing the bylaws without
approval from the members to be going nuts.
More information about the Spi-general