SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project

[Bdale Garbee]

Martin Michlmayr <tbm at cyrius.com> writes:

> I haven't seen any conversation with the board about what they need,
> what they are looking for, etc.
>
> I don't know how I should vote on a resolution without any prior
> conversation at all.
>
> Why hasn't Mark been in contact with the board?

He talked to me.  The needs and expectations seemed simple enough that I
didn't think a lot of conversation would be required, but part of the
reason for including spi-private and spi-general here was so that
discussion can occur, so go for it!

Bdale
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 810 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/attachments/20160506/3235d813/attachment.pgp>