Removal of MadWifi as an associated project
Martin Michlmayr
tbm at cyrius.com
Tue Aug 15 14:51:41 UTC 2017
* Alvaro Herrera <alvherre at alvh.no-ip.org> [2017-08-15 11:43]:
> Surely SPI needs to renew the domain on an ongoing basis -- basically
> forever -- not just one time.
SPI could just renew it now for 10 years (or 20 or 50 or whatever
makes sense) - and let it expire when nobody cares about it anymore
(except historians, but there's always archive.org).
> It seems like there ought the be clauses somewhere specifying that
> SPI should continue to do this, or that MadWifi has the authority to
> tell SPI to do so. (How? they'd not be an associated project
> anymore.) What if eventually MadWifi as a project decides to get
> the domain back for whatever reason? Is it possible for SPI to
> decide to give it back?
These are very good points. I didn't propose the resolution in the
meeting we had yesterday because the question of domain ownership
needs to be clarified.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
More information about the Spi-general
mailing list