Resolution Arch Linux 32 as associated project

Erich Eckner arch at
Thu Feb 14 16:32:47 UTC 2019

Well, when it's default, then I have no objections.


On 14.02.19 16:35, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Erich Eckner <arch at> [2019-02-14 11:23]:
>> Yes, this is fine for me. However, maybe we can put your comment about
>> Arch Linux into (3), too? Like adding ", preferably to the assets of
>> Arch Linux." (or something similar) to the end of the last sentence?
> I was considering that but in the end didn't do it because it's a
> standard sentence we use in all new project resolutions and I didn't
> want to modify it if there wasn't a strong reason.
> If you have strong feelings about it, I can add it.  Otherwise let's
> hope a) the situation won't happen and b) if it does the board will do
> the right thing.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the Spi-general mailing list