Proposed resolution - rescind position of SPI board advisors

Tim Potter tpot at
Wed Jan 8 05:45:53 UTC 2020

On 10 Dec 2019, at 10:19 am, Martin Michlmayr <tbm at> wrote:
> * Bdale Garbee <bdale at> [2019-12-09 15:59]:
>> It's not clear to me why you need to rescind the resolution instead of
>> just continuing to not actually appoint or seek advice from existing
>> appointees.  What's the problem you're actually trying to solve?
> Make sure reality is reflected.
> The annual report lists the advisors, but they haven't been consulted
> in years, so imho it makes sense to reflect that.  It also creates
> more balance between projects (why is the Debian project leader always
> an advisor?)

Just curious - is there was any more discussion on this topic? Perhaps
we can make a decision one way or the other at the board meeting next week.


More information about the Spi-general mailing list