Proposed resolution: Waive SPI 5% administrative fee for 2020 associated project conferences

[Louis-Philippe Véronneau]

On 2020-06-14 22 h 49, Joshua Drake wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 10:51 AM Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz at spi-inc.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> @all: Having slept on things, I'm changing my position from (2a) to (2c)
>> since it is more appropriate to correct the lack of charging Debian 5%
>> on sponsorships than it is to correct the actual/perceived
>> miscommunication between Debian and SPI.
>>
>> So, for clarity:
>> - do not refund Debian for 2016-2019; do not charge fees on Debian
>>   sponsorships prior to 2016; do not refund other projects (2c)
>> - charge all projects' donations and sponsorships the same 5% fee, which
>>   is the current practice (3b)
>>
>> @president: kindly consider revising the draft resolution per above
>> since there are now several of us in holding this view.
>>
>>
> +1
FWIW, I also think that's the most logical solution to this issue.

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo at debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/attachments/20200615/11804dfb/attachment.pgp>