Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status

Joshua D. Drake jd at commandprompt.com
Fri Mar 16 19:52:28 UTC 2007


Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> As for the broader issue at hand, I very much agree with Ian that if the
>> Debian liaisons to SPI don't do their job properly and timely in
>> conveying decisions relevant to SPI, it's important for DDs to notify
>> us, both to protect Debian's decision-making integrity and for SPI's
>> own due diligence in conducting transactions. Which is why paragraph 5
>> is a useful encouragement.
> 
> Well again, not so much opposed to the idea of them giving us
> information as much as us actually acting on it.
> 
> 15 DDs stood in a room and cried foul.
> 
> What does that mean?
> 
> 100 DDs stood in a room and cried foul.
> 
> What does that mean?
> 
> There are over 300 DDs aren't there?
> 

O.k. per Ian's other writeup, it appears that certain DDs have certain
powers. THat is interesting.

J



> Sincerely,
> 
> Joshua D. Drake
> 
> 
>> - Jimmy Kaplowitz
>> jimmy at spi-inc.org
> 
> 


-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/



More information about the Spi-general mailing list