Voting system for elections

Anthony Towns aj at
Wed Aug 17 02:57:09 UTC 2016

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:02:00AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 7/18/16 9:29 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > This is especially true given that our variant of Condorcet is still
> > interpreting a ballot "1. Z  2. X" as not preferring Z or X to Y,
> > which is IMO an extremely serious deficiency in itself.
> I was told off-list that this was changed now:

This seems like it doesn't actually change the way votes are counted,
though it does do most of the work so that someone can easily make that
change later? Or am I misunderstanding?


More information about the Spi-general mailing list